Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shift (website)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:34, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shift (website)[edit]

Shift (website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So far, nothing to add on this Blatant misuse of Wikipedia. Only interest is to build an online reputation and Luring customers in the name of Wikipedia. Another vanity prodded by User:Crystallizedcarbon, deleted by a stale creator account . Burn it. Sundartripathi (talk) 04:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:19, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reasons explained in the PROD. The sources are not independent (open wiki, press release, etc). There is no in-depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources, so neither WP:GNG or WP:CORP are met. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:46, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural close  The proposal to burn is uncivil and incendiary.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails GNG, PROMO. While I wouldn't say "burn it" for a promo piece like this, I don't see it as worthy of a Procedural Close either. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 02:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.