Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shesh I
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shesh I[edit]
- Shesh I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I've been searching and looking through the books I have, eg Aidan Dodson, and find no evidence for either Shesh I or Shesh II. Sesheshet is occasionally called Shesh, but she was Teti's mother and neither of these alleged Queens is said to be Teti's mother. Dougweller (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason.:
- Comment See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hent (queen) for a very similar case from the same author. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I had a look at the history of this article & also the history of the related article on the Hungarian Wikipedia. While this one was created by Gospodar svemira, the one on the Hungarian WP was created "20:19, 8. veljače 2010" (is veljače="February"? I don't speak or read Hungarian) & presumably a translation of this article. I'd like to see some sources for this personage before we decide to keep it; is Shesh I or II mentioned in the Cambridge Ancient History or any other standard reference work Doug has not mentioned? -- llywrch (talk) 23:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The onus is on anyone wanting to keep to provide evidence of notability, and after this much time nobody has done so. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- no notability demonstrated in any source, and no sources to support the claims. N2e (talk) 23:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence for either person's existence. Nyttend (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.