Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shemar Childs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shemar Childs[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable singer who doesn’t satisfy WP:SINGER nor WP:MUSICBIO. Article may also be a biographical piece Celestina007 (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No indication from reliable sources that subject meets any notability criterion. Blatant self-promotion. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.Subject does indeed meet notability criteria and follows correct format and setup. Subject as well used all possible citations and/or sources which were approved by entity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shemar8810 (talk • contribs) 13:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please indicate which of the provided references meet WP:RS and how WP:GNG is satisfied. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of coverage in reliable media.NotButtigieg (talk) 18:49, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Searched for reliable sources, but not enough found to establish notability. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 06:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~. Subject does indeed meet notability criteria and follows correct format and setup. Subject as well used all possible citations and/or sources which were approved by entity. Sources such as *Observer* follows WP:RS guidelines on being an officially News and Sports Publishing Distribution. Source as well makes sure that all majority and significant minority views have appeared and have been covered by entity. Provided reference is in fact a reliable source due to publisher being a reliable, independent publishing source with a very well known reputation for accuracy and fact checking. Shemar8810 (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can comment as much as you'd like, but each editor is only afforded one vote. GPL93 (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An opinion piece that states "Be sure to check out Yung Rose on Spotify and Instagram!" hardly meets WP:ORGIND. Also, I fail to see what relevance a reference to an album named Shemar (by an artist named Yung Rose) has in an article about an artist named Shemar. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough significant coverage from reliable sources to establish notability. Could possibly be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Shemar Childs and Yung Rose are the same person. He changed his Performance 5 months ago. How can this page be improved to be accepted? Would like advice and to understand what can be done. Shemar8810 (talk) 3:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

As indicated above, do not vote to keep multiple times. It is disruptive. For what its worth, thank you for clarifying. However, I do not see the subject of this article (which I presume is you) meeting inclusion criteria. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Vanity page. Googling finds no significant coverage under either name. Sideline observer is not a significant source for establishing notability; it is an aspiring website not of reporting/news gathering but of opinions and commentary run by and for college students (see this)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.