Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh Muhammad Amin Madni
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sheikh Muhammad Amin Madni[edit]
- Sheikh Muhammad Amin Madni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This bio of a nonnotable religious leader has been tagged as lacking notability and references since April 2008. It appears to be a pet project of one of his followers. If it stays, it needs major clean up and constant patrols. Evb-wiki (talk) 13:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 15:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - please. Averting my eyes from the glurgy dreck that is the article, I note that a google search which excludes Wikipedia gives only about six hits, and I'm not sure all of them are relevant. Allowing Wikipedia hits more than doubles the results. Also, even if we keep it, he's going to lose "Sheikh" from the article name. All indications are that this is some guy's favorite iman who has been unsuccessful in "[inducing] the most intense love for the Last Messenger of Allah" among the rest of us. Mangoe (talk) 15:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - As per above, non notable, single source, most recent activity has been unsourced additions by anonymous users, and has not been effectively cleaned up since being tagged for cleanup.Theseeker4 (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I accept that Ahmad ibn Idris is notable, but that does not extend to all of his followers. DGG (talk) 04:35, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.