Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shefali Rana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 19:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shefali Rana[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An Indian actress. Notability is at best dubious. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:05, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails: WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kolta99 (talk • contribs) 08:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete seems to fail WP:NACTOR based on online coverage in English, with only a few minor roles in notable TV and film. There's a three-paragraph quickie about her in the Times of India, but that reads like a PR piece fed to the paper from the TV network. The rest is passing mentions in blogs. I'd be willing to change to "keep" if someone who can read Hindi finds substantial coverage in reliable Hindi sources (not just telly blogs). Tracy Von Doom (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails: WP:GNG Hughesdarren (talk) 09:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @RHaworth, Hughesdarren, and CAPTAIN RAJU: there are now two articles cited from national newspapers. Your thoughts? Tracy Von Doom (talk) 21:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Three now. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 08:40, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The coverage in the Times of India and Bombay Times that have been added since the original nomination are good enough to justify keeping the article. Rana appears to be a reasonably notable actress who meets the requirements of WP:NACTOR and particularly WP:GNG. Railfan23 (talk) 21:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While the article wouldn't suffer from a cleanup, it passes WP:GNG, and just seems to scrape by on WP:NACTOR. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 05:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.