Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheetal Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Would have been speedy keep as well since no valid argument for deletion was presented. So Why 10:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sheetal Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self promotion style Jaksparowe (talk) 22:33, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 03:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 03:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-Seems borderline notable, TOI and India express have covered her marriage and her performance in the two notable films. Given that the article being promotional in nature is the primary reason for this AFD I will vote keep as this is more of a content issue. Otherwise I am leaning delete শুভ দোলযাত্রা — F R™ 15:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:09, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:45, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources demonstrate that she is notable as she's received significant coverage over time in many secondary sources about her work and her personal life. Lonehexagon (talk) 00:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.