Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheela Maini Søgaard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sheela Maini Søgaard[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough seprate coverage for this CEO fails WP:GNG Sliekid (talk) 16:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sliekid (talk) 16:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. If this were shortened to relevant biographical points it would make sense as a section about the CEO on the Bjarke Ingels Group page. Seems like a better solution than losing all of the work that's been done as it could be split back out at later date, if and when needed. --Dnllnd (talk) 15:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: While several of the sources are closely related to the subject, there are sufficient informative secondary sources to testify to notability. Additional secondary sources can easily be found in the Danish press, e.g. [1], [2].--Ipigott (talk) 10:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets general notability guidelines and plenty of other sources can be found.Ramblersen2 (talk) 12:50, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It appears to that there is adequate coverage in independent, reliable sources to meet GNG. There seem to be at least one more substantial article not already cited:

Hun kvittede sit prestigejob og er nu topchef for stjernearkitektens 600 ansatte Efter to år hos konsulentkaempen McKinsey sagde Sheela Maini Søgaard op og dermed farvel til en i manges øjne attraktiv karrierevej. Ambitionerne om at gøre karriere forblev dog intakte. Jyllands-Posten, 17 Oct 2020

Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.