Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shedu (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe | Talk 04:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shedu (Dungeons & Dragons)

Minor Dungeons & Dragons monster. Minimal in-game significance, and no evidence of any real-world significance. No mention of which books it appears in, and no soruces cited. J Milburn (talk) 20:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a note about it already exists in the Shedu article. shadzar|Talk|contribs 20:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge/redirect into Creature type (Dungeons & Dragons)#Magical beast. BOZ (talk) 02:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notable only as a pop culture reflection of the mythical creature, which is already noted in the main Shedu article. For that matter, the lammasu D&D srticle should probably be on the chopping block, too. --Ig8887 (talk) 03:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Non-notable. March is D&D Spring Cleaning Month; you can help. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the mythical Shedu page, in itself notable. Clearly the same creature...actually that page needs a bit of a cleanup itself...Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete - no assertion of notability outside of a game. Nothing worth merging to the main Shedu article, beyond the mention already there. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.