Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shay Sweet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As the requirements of WP:PORNBIO are not met by the subject winning a scene-related award, this article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shay Sweet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Standards have tightened since this was last debated in the stone age. Subject only has a scene related win and does not meet the GNG pr PORNBIO Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:52, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:52, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not pass the updated pornbio standards, and certainly fails the general nobility guide. Tarc (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Tarc. Pax 06:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - AVN Award winner. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 14:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The AVN Award win was scene-related. It does not count for passing WP:PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is what happens when editors knee-jerk their keep votes without research; "Has won a well-known and significant industry award. Awards in scene-related and ensemble categories are excluded from consideration." is no unambiguous here. Tarc (talk) 14:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are extending undeserved good faith to Subtropical-man, who is simply being disruptive because he objects to removal of virtually any porn-related content, regardless of policy, guideline or consensus. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Routine enforcement of notability standards. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.