Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharron Storer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 12:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sharron Storer[edit]
Ephemeral news figure, fails the 100-year-test. Punkmorten 21:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per above. Fails WP:BIO.--Shrek05 21:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - from WP:BIO: "Failure to meet these criteria does not mean that a subject must not be included, meeting one or more does not mean that a subject must be included. Many Wikipedians oppose the use of this guideline". The information in this article has the potential to be of use to someone somewhere at some time, and does not fail any of the more concrete, community-agreed tests for inclusion, AFAICT, so ... better deletion argument please. SP-KP 12:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per above argument. Orangehead 16:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 19:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as SP-KP. ReverendG 06:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. She complained to a politician about treatment given a sick relative. That's hardly notable or encyclopedic. AnonEMouse (squeak) 15:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Here today, gone tomorrow. Should be viewed as an incident rather than about the person, who is hardly notable. An embarrasing soundbyte for Blair, but politicians get heckled all the time, and this hardly warrants a page in wiki. Ohconfucius 05:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.