Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shari Elliker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley 00:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shari Elliker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very marginal notability--the best secondary source that actually talks about her, rather than just mention her as having (had) a job, is this--2,803 words from the Washington Post's society pages. Drmies (talk) 21:39, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Found a few sources myself. [1] is a local source, but it only talks about her losing her job, [2] mentions the same subject but seems to be a very short story. However, whilst doing a little digging I found something much more interesting than her radio work - she appears to have worked on a number of games and films - [3] shows her as having worked on Elder Scrolls III and Fallout 3, and [4] Metacritic pulls up these games and Star Trek Conquest/Legacy as also involving her. I'm fairly confident she's notable, what I'm not so sure is, how notable is she in Wikipedia terms? She may possibly qualify under WP:ENT. Lukeno94 (talk) 10:56, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Multiple independently-published sources dealing substantially with the subject showing in footnotes. Carrite (talk) 17:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:11, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 05:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.