Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShareNow (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:06, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ShareNow[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability, poorly written and the contributors seem to have a personal connection to the topic Abcmaxx (talk) 13:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see how the nominator reached the conclusion that the contributors have a personal connection to the topic. Regardless, I agree that the article fails the test of notability. A really paranoid android (talk) 01:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article was started by Davidingram (talk · contribs) and according to this website "David Ingram" was a co-founder. Џ 04:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Note This nomination was not transcluded for discussion and was missing the AfD Template. I have corrected both, please use the time of this comment as the listing time when closing. Monty ₈₄₅ 02:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG for nowMgbo120 (talk) 19:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:07, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. 3 out of 4 sources are reliable enough for it to exist. However, I would move it userspace and copyedit. ImmortalWizard(chat) 23:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tone 09:14, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 21:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.