Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Kaiser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shannon Kaiser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:BIO. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:32, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I originally PRODed this, I don't believe this person meets WP:GNG. What there is out there is minimal and routine at best. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:16, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Claim to fame is being the author of a handful of Chicken Soup books; there are so many of them—who isn't an author? הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 03:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There aren't any reliable sources out there to show that she's particularly notable. I also agree with Hasirpad- the number of authors that contribute to the Chicken Soup books are so numerous that having a piece published in one or more books in the series isn't going to be something that would give absolute notability even if simply publishing would give notability. There's just nothing out there. It doesn't help that the article reads more like a personal resume.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails notability guidlines. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:53, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable author Mike (talk) 19:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.