Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanky RS Gupta Ventom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Alright, no notability here. Salting should be asked for at RFPP or SPI - sometimes having such pages as "bait pages" for sockpuppets is useful but I don't know the sockmaster enough to assess that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shanky RS Gupta Ventom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable producer. Fails GNG Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In the past, I have received legal & other threats and lots of personal attacks, especially on social networking sites from the creator of the article. This Mr. Gupta and his SOCKS refuse to understand that they cannot push their way through. Few months back, I had also notified Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody on email [email protected] about this long term abuse. SwisterTwister, thanks for not marking this for CSD, since we will now have a discussion for record. I request everyone to keep an eye for any new articles being created about the subject / related companies and review it properly. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.