Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanell Woodgett
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Shanell Woodgett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not appear to be a notable person. Has already been speedied once and PRODed (which got contested by author). FunPika 20:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 21:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:Notability. Flyer22 (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete References show nothing which comes close to meeting WP:MUSICBIO. None of the writing credits appear to meet WP:COMPOSER. I42 (talk) 21:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete' fails WP:MUSICBIO, lacks reliable sources. Very first version of the file had a CSD tag which makes me wonder how seriously the author takes it's creation.--RadioFan (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Has co-writing credits on some biggish records but no hit songs. TheJazzDalek (talk) 16:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.