Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanee Banerjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shanee Banerjee[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be notable enough for an article. Past edits have bordered on promotional with few or unreliable sources. clpo13_(talk) 22:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Certainly fails our notability threshold, couldn't find a single reliable source. All of the three source present in the article are either user generated (Gomolo.com) which is definitely not reliable and in the others, I can see just passing mentions, they are about the film in which the actor has debuted. They are not reliable enough, though. Anyhow, the subject fails WP:BLP, WP:GNG and have to go miles before the subject pass WP:NACTOR. Jim Carter 06:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Same findings as Jim. Hopefully a case of WP: TOOSOON and he can be resubmitted with better notability in the future. Alaynestone (talk) 12:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Simply delete rather than move to the film's article as it's not even known if he'll have a lasting and best known impact with that film and there's vulnerability to recreation; my searches found nothing good and that's not surprising. SwisterTwister talk 06:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It seems to be the case of WP:TOOSOON and also fails the WP:NACTOR. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 14:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.