Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane O'Neill (tattoo artist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bmusician 01:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Shane O'Neill (tattoo artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable and unreferenced - all refs point back to the same two non-notable sources both of which trade directories - except one which establishes a fact in the 18th century unrelated to the article. Velella Velella Talk 10:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment O'Neil is actually a participant in the reality show Ink Master which is on the Spike Channel[1]. Here's an article about him from Philly.com[2] SarahStierch (talk) 22:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 14:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Sourcing all over the place. Here's A STORY IN PRICK MAGAZINE, for example... Carrite (talk) 02:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And CONFIRMATION OF THE SPIKE TV SHOW connection... Carrite (talk) 02:12, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- A figure of sufficient stature in the industry to headline the BEST OF THE MIDWEST TATTOO CONVENTION. Carrite (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is another Spike TV-related resource, but here's TEN QUESTIONS WITH SHANE O'NEILL. Carrite (talk) 02:21, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- How have I gone through life without reading Prick Magazine? UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is another Spike TV-related resource, but here's TEN QUESTIONS WITH SHANE O'NEILL. Carrite (talk) 02:21, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- A figure of sufficient stature in the industry to headline the BEST OF THE MIDWEST TATTOO CONVENTION. Carrite (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And CONFIRMATION OF THE SPIKE TV SHOW connection... Carrite (talk) 02:12, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Relisting comment: I am relisting the last time. If no more consensus will close as no consensus
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ankit MaityTalkContribs 12:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Per significant coverage in reliable sources:
- Hiltbrand, David (January 17, 2012). "Philadelphia-area tattoo artist competing on 'Ink Masters'". Philly.com. Retrieved February 15, 2012.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher= - Dekkers, John (February 2005). "Shane O'Neill". Prick Magazine. Retrieved February 15, 2012.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher= - "10 Questions With Shane O'Neill". Spike Television. January 11, 2012. Retrieved February 15, 2012.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher=
- See also: the awards and honors the person has earned (in references section of article). Northamerica1000(talk) 12:18, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hiltbrand, David (January 17, 2012). "Philadelphia-area tattoo artist competing on 'Ink Masters'". Philly.com. Retrieved February 15, 2012.
- Keep on the merits. I think the notability is a bit on the thin side, but there's sufficient sourcing to inch this over to Keep. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.