Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Hynes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 10:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shane Hynes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. Played less than 100 games in the minors. Ravenswing 03:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY or GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Redirect to List of Anaheim Ducks draft picks where he is mentioned. Note: The sheer volume of AfD nominations by this editor (45-plus and counting in the last four days alone) going straight to AfD, without first using PRODs or appropriate tagging, is disruptive. The nom should be reminded that deletion is a last resort, and per WP:BEFORE should only be used after other alternatives, including redirects, have been fully explored. Dolovis (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Except that there is no requirement to go to prod first. Especially when something is likely to be contested, and since you routinely object to prods on articles you create, it saves everyone time to take it straight to Afd, especially when all of the articles he has nominated have ended up deleted. There is no evidence that Ravenswing did not use WP:BEFORE prior to making this nomination. There is no clear redirect for this player as redirecting to a list of draft picks would be counter productive. -DJSasso (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. nn player, nothing in either Highbeam or Google news archive that would indicate a GNG pass. Just the typical trivial mentions in routine coverage of games. Reso lute 23:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails NHOCKEY and GNG. None of the leagues are considered a top professional league according to WP:NHOCKEY/LA. Patken4 (talk) 21:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.