Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamrock Squid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arguments to keep are not based in policy/guidelines and do not address the fundamental issue of notability. Shereth 21:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shamrock Squid

This "open source" cartoon character has remarkably few Google hits, and no sources. Prod tag removed. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 06:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete comic character who, according to the article, appeared in one 7-page story (and a handful of cameo appearances) and is unlikely to reappear. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable and lacking sources. Mr. Absurd (talk) 01:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable and per Google hits.--63.3.1.2 (talk) 15:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Volume of Google hits doesn't indicate qualified traffic. Notable due to fact that character appears in multiple publications. Sources can be added. Twalls (talk) 18:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Non-notable. Proxy User (talk) 02:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't see those references that were promised, so it doesn't look like this character meets the notability guidelines. NeoChaosX (talk, edits) 05:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete some google hits but nothing reliable enough to meet guide lines... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.171.248 (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the grounds of the character appearing in numerous works not written by its creator. Ford MF (talk) 14:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a claim to notability anyway. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 03:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.