Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sham marriage in the United Kingdom (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sham marriage. Sandstein 07:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sham marriage in the United Kingdom

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We don't have articles on sham marriage in other countries and I don't see anything in this article that makes the situation in the UK look unusual enough to warrant a separate article from Sham marriage. The argument for the first AfD still holds, I think the Delete/Merge arguments were stronger and this article has not been greatly improved in the 2+ years since the last AfD. Finally, 2 of the 3 "Keep" votes (User:E.M.Gregory and User:A.Jacobin) in the first AfD were sockpuppets and so I'd like to see if there is sufficient support now to keep this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We could merge it into the main "sham marriage" article, or a brief subsection. Nothing too particular about this situation in the UK that warrants its own article. Oaktree b (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is having this article particularly different from having Green card marriage, the U.S. equivalent? BD2412 T 20:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with merge proposal above. --Bduke (talk) 04:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge useful material into Sham marriage and get rid of the rest. RomanSpa (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Merge - Merging seems like a sensible way forward that will allow relevant information to be kept on a single page that is probably more accessible. Dunarc (talk) 20:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge to sham marriage.4meter4 (talk) 21:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.