Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakir Subhan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shakir Subhan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly lacks WP:GNG, given sources are not realiable and mostly not about him but about his "project" CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CommanderWaterford Please read news about shakir before detetion process --> https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Shakir+Subhan%22.

RoboShutter (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unreliable sources, not notable. –User 45 65 41 19:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not Wordpress or Youtube. Mccapra (talk) 21:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Per nom & what Mccapra said. Celestina007 (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Sources presently in the article include articles from:

These are certainly reliable sources. It is unclear why these well established reputable news providers have been described as "unreliable" herein, because these are reliable sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I admit to being asked to comment via my talk page but as Northamerica1000 says, the comments above re allegedly unreliable sources are ridiculous in context. There may be an issue with single-event notability but I'm not even going to start looking at it. - Sitush (talk) 03:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article only needs some clean up. Other than that, the YouTuber has received some coverage. Per North America 1000, sources indicated in the article are indeed reliable. The article easily passes WP:GNG. My vote stands. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A lot of sources seem to be focusing on one recent event. Is there something here further than WP:BLP1E?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:34, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability based on a single event. Fulfills all criteria of WP:BLP1E. The subject otherwise is not WP:GNG, easy delete - BhaskaraPattelar (talk) 11:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.