Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaithaan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shaithaan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a future film. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. I dream of horses (T) @ 14:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 14:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 14:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:FILM and WP:GNG. WP:Crystalball applies. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

WP:INDAFD: Shaithaan "Pradhip Krishnamurthy" "Vijay Antony" "Y. G. Mahendra" "Raja Krishna Murthy" "AVM Studios"

writer/director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

support:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for a short while. I note that WP:CBALL does not stay we cannot have articles on future events, only that if we do they be properly sourced. The article tells us that filming IS under way, so this topic can be returned under WP:NFF (paragraph 3) IF that is sourced and IF the production has enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. For now, I believe this is simply premature. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Film has not been released and is not considered a tent pole that would rate an article for an anticipated release. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 18:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.