Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahryar Niazi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing early per WP:SNOW Mark Arsten (talk) 01:19, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shahryar Niazi[edit]

Shahryar Niazi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person (who is under 18) looks to be non-notable, maybe up-and-coming. Sources look to be non-independent. (Has some detritus, including a histmerge because it was originally in AfC but then copied to mainspace) Chris857 (talk) 03:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Ambitious 16-year old. All refs are social media or primary. Hasn't done anything notable, just yet. Bgwhite (talk) 05:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Potential subject for article, if he becomes notable; currently does not meet the guidelines. Cheers, LindsayHello 05:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: An article created and edited by a sequence of probably-primary-linked accounts, including a blocked account. The subject clearly utilises a range of user-submitted sites, there is no evidence of attained biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: He is potentially notable, but the sources are not realiable. Finealt (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Yes, he is potentially notable but the sources are not reliable, as they are mostly social media and/or imdb sources. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.