Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahin Rostami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shahin Rostami[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Associate Professor. Non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 22:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Hard to figure out exactly what he does, but whether it is computer science or some form of engineering, or both, the GScholar h-index of 9 is too low for satisfying WP:PROF#C1 at this time, and there does not seem to be much else here. Nsk92 (talk) 22:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per Nsk92. "Weak" because I'm not sure how much to rely on citation count/h-index in this apparently amorphous field. Agree, though, that there seems nothing else to go on. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:56, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:TOOSOON for this 2014 PhD. Citations are too low for WP:NPROF C1, particularly in what I believe to be a high-citation field; no sign of other notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 01:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citations not good enough for WP:PROF#C1 and I think that as the second-highest rather than highest grade of honorary membership SFHEA is not enough for #C3. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 20:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.