Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahi Kabir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mcbath (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shahi Kabir[edit]

Shahi Kabir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Mcbath (talk) 03:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, India, and Kerala. Mcbath (talk) 03:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep He is a recipient of 52nd Kerala State Film Awards. As per WP:ANYBIO passes notability. 116.68.98.175 (talk) 03:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify Mcbath, why on Earth did you move this page from Draft space to main space and a minute later tag it for AFD deletion? This page should have been left in Draft space until the editors working on it submitted it for AFC review or thought it was in good enough shape to move to main space themselves. I'm trying to AGF here but I can't understand your actions regarding this draft. Why do you move this draft and then tag it for deletion? Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The article is almost finished. No more editings needed. He is a recipient of an award itself passes the notability criteria. Am I right? 116.68.98.175 (talk) 08:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify or Delete: This article has long-term UPE/socking issues. So this has to go through AFC process. The person is winner of a Kerala State Award. But that does not alone make him notable. 2409:4073:202:50DA:C3F:7AFF:FE38:6725 (talk) 16:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply As per WP:ANYBIO, The person has received a well-known and significant award is notable. 116.68.98.175 (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No, you are not right. Winning such an award means a person is more likely to be notable. However meeting that criteria is not conclusive evidence of notability not a guarantee of inclusion. Also, editorial judgment goes into each decision about whether or not to create a separate page about a specific topic. Wikipedia has no firm rules, and so there is no "mic drop" moment here. The discussion will continue. That is the point of an AFD. MaxnaCarta (talk) 03:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify Not qualified due to insufficient sources and better to be moved back to draft to be submitted. ZanciD (talk) 17:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify - Why move to main and then nominate for AFD? Makes more sense to revert back to drafify. MaxnaCarta (talk) 03:58, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mcbath per WP:SNOW I feel it would be appropriate for you to close your nomination early with an outcome of draftify, then move the article back to draft space. MaxnaCarta (talk) 10:43, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Red X I withdraw my nomination
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.