Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahbaz Khan's invasions of Mewar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:57, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shahbaz Khan's invasions of Mewar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable campaign. Only a POVFORK of Mughal conquest of Mewar, article was also created by a sockpuppet. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and India. Shellwood (talk) 15:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This article is a redundant WP:POVFORK relying mostly on misrepresentation of the cited sources and is not notable on its own.
- The first source[1] contradicts this article: "Between 1576 and 1585, Pratap foiled several expeditions headed by Mughal generals. Among them were battle-hardened and experienced commanders like Qutb-ud-din Khan, Raja Bhagwant Das of Amber, Shahbaz Khan, and Jagannath Kachchwaha."
- The second source also contradicts this article's result: "Shāhbāz Khān made a renewed attempt at suppressing the Rānā who retired to the hills, but the Mughuls re-turned unsuccessful. Six years later another expedition was sent by Akbar under Zafar Beg and Jagannātha, the Kāchhwāhāh, which met with the same fate."
- The third source doesn't concern this topic and mostly focuses on the broader Mughal conquest of Mewar. Nxcrypto Message 01:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no point in creating several articles on the same subject by copying the content. I have been nominating such poorly framed articles for a while.-Admantine123 (talk) 02:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per the nominator and Adamantine123, I agree. The article is poorly cited and non-notable. GrabUp - Talk 12:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.