Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaharon Anuar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:27, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shaharon Anuar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's one decent article, regarding him being a policeman and actor, but the rest are simple mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

which decent article, regarding him being a policeman and actor? Normal rookie (talk) 13:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Police, and Malaysia. Skynxnex (talk) 15:55, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can remove Articles for deletion for this article, because i feel enough sources. Normal rookie (talk) 06:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone reply me? Normal rookie (talk) 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Comment - still does not meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:07, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why still not reach WP:GNG? Normal rookie (talk) 11:30, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Passes WP:NACTOR through his roles in Gerak Khas and Roda-Roda Kuala Lumpur. Additionally, there is this and this which appear to be SIGCOV. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 02:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Found another article here. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 05:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks but It already have the reference you mentioned at the top. Normal rookie (talk) 07:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—On top of the sources found, there's a couple other stray mentions. Wasn't able to find another significant independent source to satisfy GNG to my eyes. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 20:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please eleaborate on how the sources I have listed above are not enough for GNG? Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 13:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as failing notability, especially in regard to GNG and ACTOR. MurrayGreshler (talk) 18:55, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please elaborate on how he fails GNG despite the sources I have listed above? Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 13:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: agree that this subject seems to fail notability. Much of the listed filmography does not seem to be notable in of itself Olivierjohnston (talk) 15:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)(sock strike Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Olivierjohnston, you are a brand new editor, how did you find your way to this AFD discussion? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not agree to delete this subject, why already have sources still not to be notable, I don't understand the notable standard regarding this subject. Normal rookie (talk) 13:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needs to be 1) Reliable (Articles titled "Sample Page Title doesn't really seems like trusty source of information); 2) Independent (No blatant flattering of the subject); 3) Significant Coverage of the subject; and 4) Demonstrate the significance of the subject. Vast majority of the sources cited for this article did not pass these four points. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR and WP:SIGCOV per the sources provided above by Somebodyidkfkdt. Not seeing a well argued delete vote given the evidence provided which does address the subject directly and in detail. The delete vote above by David Fuchs erroneously claims these are passing mentions (or perhaps he didn't look at these and was referring to sources he himself located elsewhere?) Anuar is the main subject of these publications.4meter4 (talk) 14:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Out of the 13 sources cited for this article, only the first one constitute an independent, reliable and in-depth coverage of the subject. Source 2 is a short article about him still being alive, and seems pretty unnecessary since it did not provide any crucial information that is not given by source 1; The archived version of Source 3 did not mention the subject at all; The contents in Source 4 bears suspicious resemblance to those of source 1; Concerning Source 5, the wording of the title and the inclusion of "Kacak" (Handsome) in the first caption makes me doubtful of this website's reliability, and not to mention the Same exact article was used as Source 8. The same problem happens with Source 6, where the title "Sample Page Title" does not strike confidence in the readers, not to mention that the subject was only referenced once in the whole article. Sources 7 and 12 are straight-up defunct. Sources 9, 10, 11 and 13 are fine, but I'm not sure if the honors are notable enough to pass WP:ANYBIO. I could not find any published biography about the subject, and the news articles that I could find had only trivia mention of the subject. This Wikipedia article needs a major improvement at the very least, and if the quality can not be improved by editors in the next few days, I would suggest Delete. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.