Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadowscourge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted and protected from recreation by User:BorgQueen --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 10:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shadowscourge[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

This was originally so far from claiming notability that I had tagged it with db-group. Seeing the tag the author has changed it some to try and make it look significant, so I am bringing here for community discussion. Yet another set of forums. So far off the scale that they can't afford their own hosting. Completely fails WP:WEB and reliable sources are nonexistant. Based on the above I am recommending delete. --Hetar 02:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Trash. Moe Aboulkheir 02:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The nom says it all- fails pretty much everything it can fail. It's also blatant advertisement. -- Kicking222 03:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't delete I'm the creator of this page, I'd like it to stay because I think everything should have an equal right to be on this site, and I apologize for deleting that notice above it, it's my first page and I wasn't sure wat to do. Shadowscourge is just a legidimate group on the opposite side of the scale of SuperShadow. As for my sources gentlemen, if u take the time to read certain elements on dtheatre.com, the story is right there for you to see. Sato Stars 11:36, May 31st 2006 (UTC)
Delete, nn. --Ter e nc e Ong 03:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Seems to have been speedy deleted, likely under a db-group. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note -- as at this daydatetime, the page appears already to have been deleted, rending this whole ~~argument~~ discussion moot. -- SockpuppetSamuelson 07:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's deleted now..--Andeh 10:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.