Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadowclan (4th nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ultima Online.  Sandstein  12:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shadowclan[edit]

Shadowclan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The references listed are not notable (and for a large part of them, inaccessible). Looking through the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, I get one result by Engadget, but the page links to an interview on the World of Warcraft website... Which can't be found. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or merge to a section at Ultima Online's history. The article achieved notability when created, and notability is not temporary. Several of its references, such as the interview, can be found at archive.org, and several of them are published books as listed in previous AfD nominations (an thus can't disappear nor become invalid references). Diego (talk) 11:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  10:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge or just redirect to Ultima Online, per above agreement. Not impressed by the previous discussions—where are the sources? There should be a section in the parent article about its Community, which would certainly be a notable aspect of the game currently neglected in its article. I don't see how Shadowclan deserves more than a sentence or two in such a section as it is, but it can be more useful as a redirect/merge in that case. czar 20:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.