Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sha Tin College

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sha Tin College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Tin College Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no sources linking to anything other than the Sha Tin College and ESF websites, the school and parent organisations respectively. There is insignificant non-trivial coverage of this topic in secondary and third-party sources. not meeting WP:N. Furthermore, the article reads like an advertisement. 220.246.180.6 (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2017 (UTC) lodged byO Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis[reply]

  • Keep – this is a notable Hong Kong secondary school. I agree the article is largely unencyclopedic and needs reliable secondary sources. I will work on cleaning it up in the coming days. Citobun (talk) 16:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A well-known Hong Kong secondary school, and an object of substantial coverage in reliable sources. More than 1500 potential sources in the South China Morning Post alone [1]. Notable under any reasonable standard. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep passes WP:GNG as per the sources such as South China Morning Post identified above Atlantic306 (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES; now trimmed of its cruft and peacockery, it's much as most High School articles should be. Or getting there, anyway. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 06:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.