Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexy Sushi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sexy Sushi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability for music articles. Entirely self-released output through Bandcamp. Semitransgenic _talk. 14:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Semitransgenic _talk. 14:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Matches the criteria Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself, as shown in [1] (Libération), [2] (L'Express) or [3] (Les Inrockuptibles). --Dereckson (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Dereckson's sources. --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 07:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Extensive coverage by the Francophone press speaks in favour of notablility. More examples: [4][5][6][7][8][9] -- 山村貞子 (talk) 04:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.