Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex swing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. References have been added, rendering the original nomination obsolete. Feel free to renominate if the references are considered not meeting WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV standards. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sex swing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources in article, and I couldn't find any save for this short story in GQ. Fails WP:GNG. Everymorning (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Well its quite known device. I will try to look for some reliable sources to add. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I concur with Arthistorian that this device is pretty popular hence nearly a case of obvious. Pwolit iets (talk) 12:36, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well known and used device within BDSM communities. 1.129.96.230 (talk) 13:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Wikipedia articles are supposed to be based on their coverage in WP:Reliable sources. Do see WP:Notability. The above keep arguments are weak. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.