Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex-sexualism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Peacent 01:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sex-sexualism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Recently invented "movement" with no sources. —Celithemis 22:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No relevent Google results whatsoever. From sentences like "It borrows properties from humanist movements and self-valuing movements (e.g. Satanism)", I'm guessing this is a hoax; I've added the relevent tag. -- simxp (talk) 23:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neologism.--Ispy1981 00:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as all above. JJL 17:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Might be notable enough to merit inclusion if there was any sourcing at all upon which to base a judgment. The fact that it doesn't show up in Google isn't in itself fatal -- see WP:GOOGLEHITS -- but since it doesn't, it makes it hard for us to seek out sources which might verify this information. Given no reliable (or any other kind of) attributions per WP:ATT, it's not possible to determine if this there is any such thing as this supposed philosophy of sexuality. Get us some sources, and I might be willing to change my opinion. --Ace of Swords 17:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Note that this is the originating editor's first and only Wikipedia edit. For whatever that fact is worth. --Ace of Swords 17:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 20:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V. -- Satori Son 03:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.