Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth L. Harrison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 13:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seth L. Harrison

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently sourced to the website of the subject's own company. I am unable to find any coverage in reliable independent sources. Taavi (talk!) 10:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Taavi (talk!) 10:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I could not find any sources to meet the thresholds of WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. This is just a passing mention without analysis, and this was written by himself, if I'm interpreting things correctly. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no independent in-depth sources available, slim changes of passing WP:BASIC. NotAGenious (talk) 14:57, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've made a quick attempt to come up with substantive secondary sources and am not finding them. This[1] is just beyond "passing mention" but not by much and it doesn't support the article content. Oblivy (talk) 01:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because the subject fails Wikipedia:Notability. None of the sources I found are valid per GNG and certainly not the Wikipedia source which is presently the only one cited in the article. Here is a source assessment table:

**Source assessment table: prepared by User:IAmHuitzilopochtli**
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Bloomberg (https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/person/1902407#xj4y7vzkg)			Passing mention, basically, nothing significant here.	✘ No
Various Company websites	He is a part of these companies			✘ No
Crunchbase and LinkedIn	Primary sources			✘ No
Wikipedia (only source presently in article)		WP:Wikipedia is not a reliable source		✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

IAmHuitzilopochtli (talk) 03:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.