Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Eisner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Eisner

Fails WP:BIO and WP:V, can not find any sources to confirm this person was in fact the COO of Microsoft Tiptoety ^talk 01:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I'm finding a couple of marginal sources that at least state that he worked for Microsoft, but nothing yet seems to assert his notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, marginal notability as an executive with various companies, but needs sources desperately. He was very clearly never COO of Microsoft. --Dhartung | Talk 03:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, especially given that this article was started by User:Jacobeisner and thus is almost certainly a WP:COI. --Ig8887 (talk) 05:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong deleteThis seems rather hoaxy to me as there is no mention of Seth Eisner and "Inrix Inc." Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment not a hoax but he was probably not COO of Microsoft. He was "Senior Vice President, Operations and Supplier Services" (see Expedia annual report [1]) and "corporate director" for Expedia.com and "director of capital markets" for Microsoft. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 18:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete definitely fails WP:BIO basic criteria even if it is all true. – jaksmata 20:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Working at Microsoft does not automatically make one notable. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.