Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergiy Vilkomir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No objection to a relist when more input might come Star Mississippi 01:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sergiy Vilkomir

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG, most cited article on Scholar is 451 (which has a total of 15 co-authors, and his name is 13th), while other all other articles remained under 70 citations. Breach of WP:CONFLICT, page is created by Jonathan Bowen (user Jpbowen), who is the co-author of 4 out of the 5 'selected publications', and appears in 3 out of the 7 references. Large portion of Scholar articles has Jpbowen as the author/co-author. Whole article is written like a resume.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: While this person may be borderline, I believe that he meets the WP:PROF "Average Professor Test", noting that "this is a guideline and not a rule; exceptions may exist. Some academics may not meet any of these criteria, but may still be notable for their academic work." In passing, I would also note that this is a rather inopportune moment to be deleting Ukrainian scientists. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 13:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:23, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 23:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfortunately I don't see any of the criteria set in WP:NACADEMIC being met. Sources are either not independent or trivial. Alan Islas (talk) 04:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.