Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Sepúlveda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Sepúlveda

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BEFORE does not show any secondary sources discussing subject significantly. Doesn't meet any notability guideline. AmirŞah 22:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Journalism, and Mexico. AmirŞah 22:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. He is notable;[1] the problem, as usual, is that the articles don't reflect it. Nothing is lost if the page gets deleted. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If anything, this AFD should be treated as a WP:BLPPROD. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Nom. The state of the article does not determine notability. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Resources (WP:RS/IMDB), WP:CITINGIMDB, WP:IMDB-EL, IBDb is not a reliable source and any source that is, should be used in a "References" section and not the External links. There is no talk page but if there was it would have a BLP notification. The sourcing criteria is higher on these type articles. The burden to try to preserve an article depends on WP:Neutral point of view, WP:Verifiability, and WP:No original research. The subject is listed as a journalist (twice) with no evidence to support this. Sometimes there is just not enough coverage in reliable and independant sources allowing preservation. -- Otr500 (talk) 11:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to keep a BLP we must have reliable sources connected to the article. IMDb is not reliable, so we have no reliable sources at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.