Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Savarese
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 02:30, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sergio Savarese[edit]
- Sergio Savarese (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable guy. Only reference is his obituary. Article is a homage. damiens.rf 14:42, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A news obit in The New York Times is generally a solid indicator of notability. Basic GNews and HighBeam searches show not only that similar obits appeared in other papers, but also that there was substantial coverage while he was alive: Washington Post[1], Chicago Tribune[2], Los Angeles Times[3], etc. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:10, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Arxiloxos. Obituaries in major newspapers across the country,[4] plus coverage beforehand[5][6] and mentions in various books more than satisfy WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Passes WP:BASIC. Cavarrone (talk) 17:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.