Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serge April

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Serge April

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO. ambassadors are not inherently notable, and this one only gets minor coverage. marked for notability concerns for over 2 years and no improvement made to article. LibStar (talk) 04:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:DIPLOMAT there is no presumed notability for Ambassadors . They can be redirected to List of Xian Ambassadors to Y but there are no such lists for the subjects posts. Not enough coverage in reliable sources to verify and sustain an article. Fails general notability and WP:ANYBIO. Jbh ^Talk 13:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Diplomats can be notable enough for Wikipedia articles if they garner enough coverage in their own right to satisfy WP:GNG, but they are not a class of topic that gets an automatic entitlement to keep an unsourced or primary sourced article just because they exist. Redirection to a list wouldn't be suitable because there are multiple lists that could be chosen and all or most of them don't even exist yet anyway. Bearcat (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.