Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serenity Payload

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Serenity Payload[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A buzzword for a Lockheed weapons system that appears to be non-notable; article is promotional. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:04, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note - the Payload bit in the title is not useful for BEFOREing nor does it seem to be the product name. The product name is Serenity (awful keyword - needs to be filtered with acoustic or sensor). The manufacturer isn't Lockheed (it's Logos Technologies AFAICT). The system itself probably is notable - the question here is more if this needs a dose of TNT.Icewhiz (talk) 14:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, so its not about how much cargo Serenity can carry? Coolabahapple (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NPRODUCT; promotional article, even including the pricing. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-promotional article including a major technology currently in use by the US Department of Defense in warfare worldwide. Rafreyna (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources are all to military industry niche publications, so fails WP:AUD. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:28, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Daask (talk) 15:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article seems promotional in nature due to it focusing heavily on how great the product is, mentioning the price, and apparent insider jargon like masts and aerostats the average reader wouldn't understand. It also fails WP:NPRODUCT because it fails to demonstrate notability in any way, such as how many units has the U.S. military bought or what effect it has had on the U.S. military in practice. Newshunter12 (talk) 10:38, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.