Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbian South African
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep since nomination had been withdrawn. (non admin closure) Arfæst! 17:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Serbian South African (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing but a dictionary definition. Prod removed. —Swpbtalk 17:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
I don't see why the article is not good,there is a source about number of Serbian community in South Africa? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lackope (talk • contribs) 20:44, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete If there are no notable Serbian South Africans or any information on the community itself then the information referencing the population total is best housed in Demographics of South Africa. If further information is added, I'm amenable to changing my view. I eat BC Fish (talk) 00:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - As a result of the additions by MirkoS18, I'm changing my vote to keep. I eat BC Fish (talk) 21:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Comment I added some information from a sources that I found online.--MirkoS18 (talk) 13:55, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- As nominator, I change my position to keep as a result of the contributions by MirkoS18. —Swpbtalk 21:07, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.