Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seraphic Blue
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. -Splash - tk 15:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seraphic Blue[edit]
- Seraphic Blue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable homemade CRPG; fails WP:WEB. Percy Snoodle 15:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - external links only include one independent review, which is not enough to establish notability per WP:WEB; other links are to sites affiliated with the game. Delete unless appropriate sources are added by the end of this AfD. Walton Vivat Regina! 15:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete RPG made with RPG Maker, fails WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless independent, third-party reliable sources are found. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 19:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone else. Acalamari 23:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri (via) 07:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Website guidelines do not apply to downloadable games. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 07:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the game doesn't meet WP:N, either - so even if you feel WP:WEB doesn't apply, the game doesn't pass the notability criteria. Percy Snoodle 19:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: My point is that the nominator has failed to establish a reason for deletion. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment my understanding is that failing to pass the appropriate notability criteria - be it WP:WEB or just WP:N - is sufficient reason. However, Ii'm happy to be corrected. Percy Snoodle 08:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: My point is that the nominator has failed to establish a reason for deletion. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the game doesn't meet WP:N, either - so even if you feel WP:WEB doesn't apply, the game doesn't pass the notability criteria. Percy Snoodle 19:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.