Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sequester (web series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | Talk 02:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sequester (web series)[edit]

Sequester (web series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a web series, referenced almost entirely to its own self-published content about itself (Twitter and/or main website) with no evidence of reliable source coverage about it in media shown at all. The only non-primary source here is its Alexa.com ranking, which is not valid support for notability: no number of online viewers or Twitter followers hands the clickee an exemption from having to be the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. User: Bearcat is right. Article does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability, Game show has only about 12,000 Twitter followers which positively correlates with non-notability in my estimation for a game show, but does not establish non-notability. Knox490 (talk) 01:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.