Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sepehr Sepi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 23:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sepehr Sepi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I doubt if this person meets the demands of WP:AUTHOR. Credited with the single appearance in a TV series [1]; all the rest is either unprovable or unsubstantial. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looking at the sources, only the first one (OwjNews) seems to even have a chance at being RS, but there doesn't seem to be any info on it online and in the article it links to a Telegram group called "sepehrsepinews" which is suspicious. I'm not familiar with Persian/Farsi but it seems that the rest are:

User-generated/fan-made blogs (3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 16, 19, 20). Also note that nearly all of these sources seem to be extremely recent, within the past few weeks.
A forum (2)
A 404 error (11)
Generic pages containing info/lyrics/downloads on many songs and nothing about Sepi (7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18)

And as per nom, fails WP:AUTHOR. Fails WP:SINGER as well -- the only possible matching criterion given what is in the article and online is #10 "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable", but I wouldn't say that appearing as a pianist in one episode of a TV series counts, especially given that the criterion continues "But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article" and WP:1E. eviolite (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 21:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per Eviolite's thorough analysis above. Seems to be a purely promotional article. Lennart97 (talk) 15:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.