Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senators Third Jersey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge and redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 11:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Senators Third Jersey[edit]

I would like to recommend that this article be deleted, and its contents added to the Ottawa Senators article. I don't think an article about a jersey such as this is needed or encyclopedic standing alone by itself. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 19:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't know enough about hockey to know if this is at all significant, but the picture is already in the other article. Why not just go ahead and make this page a redirect? -Jcbarr 22:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge this seems like a clear merge Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 22:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge on second thought I agree with Segv11. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 22:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, per existing arguments. -Rebelguys2 23:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to review the parent article Third Jersey. Specifically, scroll down to the "Descriptions" section — every single team in the NHL already has an article on its third jersey. I'd favour the merge, but it has to be done to all of those articles equally; it can't just be done in this particular case while otherwise leaving the other 25 "third jersey" articles alone. If those are kept as is, then this has to be kept too. Bearcat 17:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Segv11. To the nominator: you can be bold and merge/redirect articles yourself, they don't need to come here. Stifle 23:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Merge if that exists. As a prominent hockey editor there is no reason as to why this should have its own article. Croat Canuck 06:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. -- JamesTeterenko 01:33, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.