Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semper Fudge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 10:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semper Fudge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about an person's Xbox Live gamertag; they are free to say in userspace but not in main namespace. Andewz111 (no 'r') (PingusTM) - Linux rulez! (nudge me) 06:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I tagged this for speedy deletion as being about a non-notable person; if for some reason that's declined, then delete per nom. Glenfarclas (talk) 06:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A7. Shadowjams (talk) 08:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. I'm willing to accept the view that "real person" for the purposes of A7 extends to individual gamertags. --Mkativerata (talk) 08:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely. Only the crazy fictions of CSD would permit gamer tags or pseudonyms to escape the guideline. At least when animals were escaping the criteria, however absurd, there was some logical, if not rational, basis for it. In this instance, gamer tags clearly qualify. Shadowjams (talk) 08:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy salt and delete - Fails notability by WP:POKEMON - don't bother merging him with the list of live non-notable people. kgrr ^talk 10:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.