Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selena Trewarne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Selena Trewarne[edit]

Advertising for a non-notable jewelry designer. Article is identical to a press release released on her site, but not deletable through the copyvio process because it was posted by the subject's webmaster. Gets all of six Google hits outside Wikipedia and her own sites. —Cryptic (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Have seen this girl's jewellery work - and it is good - but that doesn't make it a pedia article. V i r tualSteve 08:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete why are so many Aussies spamming Wiki tonight? Boredom? Oh yeah, as per nom. Bobby1011 09:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Croc hunting season just finished. Cnwb 02:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yet another cheapskate using WP as free advertising. Camillus (talk) 14:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Little verifiable evidence that she is notable enough yet for Wikipedia. 01:17, 22 February 2006 (UTC) Capitalistroadster 05:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 01:17, 22 February 2006 (UTC)" . Capitalistroadster 01:17, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- not notable. - Longhair 01:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. --Roisterer 06:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- ~~~~
Deco 23:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.