Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selçuk Yorgancıoğlu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Selçuk Yorgancıoğlu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP not meeting notability criteria Yankeeeye (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very well-known Turkish businessman, one of the pioneers in the field of Investment Banking and Private Equity in Turkey. Yorgancioglu should be considered notable since he was quoted many times by very well-known newspapers, the article is NPOV with reliable sources. For example: Yorgancioglu is the business-partner of Arif Naqvi. Hurriyet's Vahap Munyar(one of the largest newspapers in Turkey)quotes: Selcuk Yorgancioglu and Abraaj Capital with their skills will take Acibadem Healthcare(an investee company)to the world-league. This was one of the largest exits in Turkey and later IHH's IPO was ranked 5th worldwide in 2012. User:PEguyTR 11:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unnotable, or at least not convincingly so Ithinkicahn (talk) 17:47, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:19, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.