Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seitai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seitai[edit]

Seitai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious promotion of the subject.

Although still biased, maybe the article could be restored up to this edition. In the next revision, the content was substituted with the current spam by a cross-wiki single-purpose account, Katsumi Mamine (originally, Fundación SEITAI Barcelona, globally renamed after I had told the user that name wasn't acceptable - see es:User talk:Katsumi Mamine). Sabbut (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Obviously this is pseudoscience, coupled with linguistic confusion. (Why are JAPANESE words in capitals?) It could be described from outside, if a rational is found, but even the earlier revision is frankly awful. WP should not include (non-quoted) sentences that open with "Technically", followed by complete nonsense. Imaginatorium (talk) 15:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.