Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seema Sonik Alimchand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 03:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seema Sonik Alimchand[edit]

Seema Sonik Alimchand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy WP:BLP. Her only claim to significance is having written a book and having collated music pieces for a music album. Certainly not enough to be in an encyclopaedia. kashmiri TALK 16:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 20:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 20:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there hardly seems much to even suggest a minimally better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 03:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. -©2015 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 13:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete clearly WP:TOOSOON if ever. The book was just released, and aside from promotion on its release, there is no coverage. It has not been critically reviewed. The earlier CD compilation did not bring Seema Sonik Alimchand significant coverage. I note that in her past she has also been a "freelance voice professional" and self-published a book "Catty KT", neither of which brought her independent coverage. She fails WP:BLPNOTE and does not qualify under WP:NAUTHOR.  --Bejnar (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I agree with Bejnar 7&6=thirteen () 20:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.